|
Writing
and Talking About History > History 299
Materials > History 299 Tips
Tips
for an Easier Semester
Do
not avoid a topic because it does not involve
a blood-and-guts debate.
Some
of the best HIST 299 historiographical papers
have dealt with historians' agreement and the
reasons for that agreement. Your research job
is to investigate and to make discoveries. You
may discover more debate than you expect; you
may discover less.
Do
not avoid a topic because historians have studied
it extensively, e.g., the Dreyfus Affair, the
internment of Japanese-Americans during World
War II, and the Battle of Little Big Horn.
Such
extensive study will provide you with many sources--and
probably even historiographical articles--to exploit.
Do
not avoid a topic simply because historians have
not studied it extensively, as long as they have
studied it to some degree.
You
will likely be able to focus on why they have
not studied it more than they have.
If
there are no (or few) books on your topic, there
are still likely to be journal articles on it.
In addition, many books and articles on related
topics will likely touch on your subject, e.g.,
books on Robert E. Lee will discuss, or mention,
many of minor figures and battles of the Civil
War.
A
historiographical paper requires taking notes
on topics that will likely be new to you: the
author (a historian? a journalist? a sociologist?),
his/her approach and methodology (political history?
social history? quantitative history? original?
synthetic?), and sources (primary? secondary?).
You
have collected "enough sources" when
you have exhausted the finding aids and when you
have answered all of your research questions,
not when you have found a certain magic number
of books and articles.
Mr.
Bales needs to know -- through your Research Log
-- how thoroughly you have searched for sources.
Therefore,
he needs to know which finding aids were not useful,
as well as which ones were. This means that your
Log must include finding aids which do not help
your research.
|