MWC
SACS Self-Study
Academic Affairs Committee
Minutes, December 1, 2000
4 P.M.
Present: Azukas, Coleman, Columbus, Cox-Hanley, Hartman,
Norwood, Smith, Stevenson
Absent: Blakemore, Hydorn
1. We spent some time clarifying our focus and discussing
the kinds of specific issues which might help us better
make planning recommendations to the steering committee.
We also reviewed some of the enrollment projections for
the JMC campus and how they might impact the relationship
between the MWC and JMC campuses.
2. We discussed several issues that could affect our recommendations
and directed Roy to bring them to the attention of the steering
committee for comment and feedback.
- Visits to other campuses which have dealt with this
transition should precede any recommendations we will
make, of course. They might also be very helpful in deciding
some of the questions we might wish to ask of our own
campus sources. Administrative members of the committee
were particularly eager to be included in planed visits.
They could then better understand the challenges they
face.
- Plans for JMC campus, whether about classes or administrative
facilities are logically tied to plans for the physical
plant. What are those projections for the next decade?
More specificity would mean better planning.
- Does MWC/JMC intend to invest in distance learning?
Plans for physical plant and student numbers could potentially
be significantly affected by distance learning.
3. Additional ideas for us to consider as we work on our task
include:
- Deciding how to weight the interests of different constituencies
in our planning. Should our work be weighted toward students,
faculty, or administrators? For example if economies of
staffing conflict with satisfaction with student services,
which should be given greater weight?
- If we plan to ask for student input via questionnaires,
students would need considerable background. Only then
could they give helpful feedback. (Perhaps students should
be polled through focus groups?)
- The success or failure of new degrees and programs
could be significantly affected by the type of oversight
they receive. Should it be assigned only to JMC campus
or should there always be some input from MWC faculty
and staff?
4. We will not meet again formally until the end of January.
Roy asks that each member of the committee look over the list
of questions provided with this meetingís agenda and the items
above. Email any further questions, suggested revisions of
existing questions, or requests for information to so they
can be compiled for that meeting. Interim summaries may be
provided. Roy can also provide an email list for the to nay
who wish it.
Adjourned 5:20.
|