Present:, Azukas, Hydorn, Smith
Absent: Blakemore, Coleman, Columbus, Cox-Hanley, Hartman, Norwood, Stevenson

We examined the proposed questions for administrators.  They seem perfectly reasonable as a starting point, although they are not all equally important to our committee.

Here are the questions:

 MWC and JMC Administrators

 1. What are the major problems that you see developing in your administrative area as the institution moves to university status?
 

 2. Ideally, what administrative structure would address these problems?
       a) in the near term (0-5 yrs)
       b) in the long term (5-10 yrs)
 

 3.  What would be the most effective administrative organizational structure for the new university?  Which functional units should remain merged?  Which should be separated between the two campuses?
 

 4.  Does your office see any fundamental differences between the services provided to the two campuses?
 

 5.  Are there things that are needed in your area that we are not currently providing to either or both campuses?
 

 6.  Can you identify resources (staff, space and/or funds) that will be needed by or that can be deleted from your administrative area as the university develops?  Identify the parameter that will trigger the change.
        a.  0-5 yrs
        b. 5-10 yrs 
 
 

We also looked at the list of potential interviewees from Rosemaryís committee.  This list doesnít match our list exactly.  For example, we would have much less interest in what Bill Anderson, Bernie Chirico, and Sabrina Johnson would have to say about academic services than others on the list.  We added Stephanie Smith, head of disabilities services, to the list.

People to Interview
 
 

It also seems to us that we might benefit from having people with overlapping responsibilities talk with us together.  For example, David Ayersman, Carol Martin, and Mark Saferstone.  Other group interviews might include Meta Braymer, Phil Hall, and John Morello or Karen Hartman and Roy Strohl.