I. Mission |
Data
Source
|
Research
approach
|
Other
Committees Involved?
|
 |
How can we define our mission(s) to maximize our
flexibility, while simultaneously creating adequate
definition, to sustain the growth and development
of the institution as a whole and in its constituent
parts? |
|
|
|
 |
What "conditions" in the Mission & Image CommitteeÌs
areas of responsibility are critical for a move to
University status to be successful? How
can we assure that those conditions are optimized?
E.g. clear missions & firewalls between the two
campuses |
|
|
|
II. Balance distinctiveness
and economies of scale |
|
|
|
 |
What do you see as the distinctive features which
define MWC (i.e. the Fredericksburg Campus)? |
|
|
|
 |
What do you see as the threats to the
distinctive features of MWC? What should be
done to defeat/deflect those threats, and to protect/maintain
the distinctive features? E.g. against future intervention
by the BOV, SCHEV, or university administration? |
|
|
|
 |
How can we enhance the distinctive features of MWC?
How can we make MWC more distinctive? |
|
|
|
 |
What do you see as the distinctive features which
define JMC (i.e. the Stafford Campus)? |
|
|
|
 |
What do you see as the threats to the distinctive
features of JMC? What should be done to defeat/deflect
those threats, and to protect/maintain the distinctive
features? |
|
|
|
 |
How can we enhance the distinctive features of JMC?
How can we make JMC more distinctive? |
|
|
|
 |
Where will linkages between MWC and JMC enhance
the two programs? Where can linkages be tolerated?
Where can linkages not be tolerated between the two
programs? |
|
|
|
 |
Where do the distinctions between MWC and JMC need
to be maintained to protect their respective missions
and images? |
|
|
|
III. Image |
|
|
|
 |
To what extent does it make sense to separate
the identities of the two schools? When is it
preferable to link them? Do we have different
stakeholders? Should we have? |
|
|
|
 |
How do we maintain and develop our reputation for
excellence in all our academic endeavors? |
|
|
|
 |
How do you see the expectations of faculty/staff/students
changing with university status? |
|
|
|
 |
What are other institutions which have grown laterally,
rather than vertically, and within which exist Ïsemi-autonomousÓ
units, which might serve as models for our new university? |
Analog |
|
[This question is not unique to our committee.] |
 |
What has been the experience of other institutions,
similar to Mary Washington, who have moved to Ïuniversity
statusÓ (whether laterally or vertically) in recent
years? |
Analog |
|
|
 |
How did the missions and images of other schools
change after they moved to university status?
What were the positive/negative changes? What
was unexpected? |
Analog |
|
|
 |
What did other schools do with respect to separate
images, publications, commencements, etc.? |
Analog |
|
|
 |
What are (smallish) universities which originated
from liberal arts colleges, and which colleges still
maintain a strong identity as a liberal arts institution?
E.g. Harpur College/Binghamton University (1965) |
Analog |
|
|
 |
How does Harpur College maintain such a strong sense
of identity within the larger university? |
Analog |
|
|
 |
How did the university build on the strong foundation
provided by Harper? |
Analog |
|
|